In a rare show of bipartisan consensus, both Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump have expressed opposition to California’s Proposition 12. Their responses were part of a written Q&A published by the American Farm Bureau Federation, addressing issues critical to rural America and agriculture.
Patchwork of State Regulations a Concern
When asked about the impact of state-specific regulations, neither presidential candidate voiced support for Prop. 12. The proposition, which mandates specific housing requirements for livestock, has been a contentious issue among farmers, especially those outside California who are affected by its reach.
The Harris campaign emphasized their commitment to reducing barriers for farmers, ranchers, and small business owners nationwide. A campaign representative stated, “We will fight to reduce barriers and make it easier for farmers, ranchers, and other small business owners across the country to earn a living and support a family off their hard work.”
Former President Trump offered a more direct critique, pledging to combat regulations like Prop. 12. “I will use all authority under the Constitution and U.S. law to stop efforts by California — or other states — that hurt American farmers in other states,” the Trump campaign stated. “I will also direct the Department of Justice and the Department of Agriculture to actively monitor — and strongly oppose — any further efforts to limit the ability of American farmers to sell their products anywhere in this great country.”
NPPC’s Stance on Prop. 12
The National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) has consistently fought against Prop. 12, which they argue sets a dangerous precedent for regulations that could harm pork producers nationwide. Regardless of the outcome of the 2024 election, the NPPC plans to continue its efforts to work with the next administration to combat regulations like Prop. 12.
“Our message to all the candidates is the same — we must fix Prop. 12,” stated NPPC representatives.
Why This Matters
The opposition to California’s Prop. 12 continues to grow across party lines, drawing support from significant figures in agriculture policy such as Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack, House Agriculture Committee Chairman Glenn “GT” Thompson, and Ranking Member Senator John Boozman. As this bipartisan effort builds momentum, it highlights the potential for unified action in Washington to address what many see as an overreach of state regulations impacting farmers across the country.
